Papers with Text-to-SQL parsing

5 papers
MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQL (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent LLM-based Text-to-SQL methods suffer from performance degradation on “huge” databases and complex user questions that require multi-step reasoning.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates a decomposer agent and auxiliary agents to generate SQL queries from natural language text.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves comparable execution accuracy on SQL-Llama tasks compared to the baseline model.
SynTQA: Synergistic Table-based Question Answering via Mixture of Text-to-SQL and E2E TQA (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Text-to-SQL parsing and end-to end question answering have yet to be compared and their synergy remains unexplored.
Approach: They propose a Synergistic Table-based Question Answering approach that integrates different models via answer selection.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves on multiple benchmarks and on large scale datasets.
Towards Generalizable and Robust Text-to-SQL Parsing (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Text-to-SQL parsers must be generalizable and robust against input perturbations.
Approach: They propose a novel framework to learn text-to-SQL parsing in stages to improve parser's ability to acquire general SQL knowledge instead of capturing spurious patterns.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Spider, SParC, and CoSQL datasets.
Decoupled Dialogue Modeling and Semantic Parsing for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL (2021.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on Text-to-SQL for multi-turn dialogue has attracted great interest . current approaches mostly employ end-to end models and face data sparsity problems .
Approach: They propose a decoupled multi-turn text-to-SQL framework where dialogue context is explicitly solved by an utterance rewrite model and a single-turn Text-toSQl parser are proposed.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing models on SParC and CoSQL datasets without annotated in-domain data.
Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT - A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparison (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a number of open-source large language models claim to be performing better than commercial ones . however, these models fall short of the performance achieved by closed-source models like GPT-3.5 .
Approach: They evaluate six popular large language models against each other to evaluate their performance . authors say open-source models are not as effective as those built by commercial models .
Outcome: a new set of models claim to match or surpass the language understanding abilities of commercial models . the results show that the models performed far below the performance of closed-source models compared to open-source ones .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations